Subject	Re: I thought the 30p(na) had a smaller intake port setup
Posted by	Tech@EPR on March 27, 2011 at 3:26 PM
	This message has been viewed 277 times.
In Reply To	I thought the 30p(na) had a smaller intake port setup posted by KongZTT GT28RS MD on March 25, 2011 at 03:37 AM
Message	I've done both on measuring port volume and both are right at dead nuts to each other with volume. Same as the chambers. Port flange area I've also seen to be the same with a variance due to core shift. I've ported both NA and TT heads and both do just as good as the other in terms of performance. I've seen NO difference between the two with the exception of what I've mentioned before.
Follow Ups	Broken valve guide... - Trav (NC) 20:15:00 03/23/11 Very interesting! - Zarcasm(Hfd, CT) 21:33:03 03/23/11 A crappy shop would just do the one guide. - Draker (Eugene, OR) 21:39:07 03/23/11 Also noticed some are stamped 30P, some EG - Trav (NC) 00:03:06 03/24/11 Re: Also noticed some are stamped 30P, some EG - Tech@EPR 04:23:07 03/24/11 I thought the 30p(na) had a smaller intake port setup - KongZTT GT28RS MD 03:37:53 03/25/11 that was my understanding as well - aliaZ 03:47:12 03/25/11 That's interesting. Broke down the passenger head yesterday. - Trav (NC) 09:57:10 03/25/11 well, that explains the broken guide - aliaZ 17:39:56 03/25/11 Meaning the previous machine shop switched NA and TT valves? (n/m) - Zarcasm(Hfd, CT) 00:17:18 03/26/11 Correct me if I'm wrong, I thought 30p valves weren't just - Trav (NC) 17:59:06 03/26/11 Wait, what explains the broken guide? - Trav (NC) 17:54:29 03/26/11 Yep.. I remember seeing Rob's motor he got from SGP - KongZTT GT28RS MD 10:31:56 03/25/11 Re: I thought the 30p(na) had a smaller intake port setup - Tech@EPR 15:26:27 03/27/11 odd... I wonder if the yr head - KongZTT GT28RS MD 15:38:36 03/27/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.